From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 19 01:03:16 2007
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7287816A468;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:03:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vanilla@fatpipi.com)
Received: from mail.fatpipi.com (220-135-222-5.HINET-IP.hinet.net
	[220.135.222.5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D87C13C46E;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vanilla@fatpipi.com)
Received: by mail.fatpipi.com (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 18B222E025; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:03:15 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:03:15 +0800
From: "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@fatpipi.cirx.org>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20070619010315.GA93154@fatpipi.cirx.org>
References: <200706181421.l5IEL76Q021707@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20070618155933.GA73067@rot13.obsecurity.org>
	<20070618160706.GA53313@fatpipi.cirx.org>
	<20070618170138.GA73856@rot13.obsecurity.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070618170138.GA73856@rot13.obsecurity.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	"Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/papi Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
	pkg-message
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:03:16 -0000

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:01:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> From what the maintainer told me it was just a fix to remove an
> unnecessary check that was causing the configure script to fail.
> Presumably you also verified this yourself by checking the diff.  If
> not, you were supposed to.
> If so, then it clearly falls under the cases in which portrevision
> should not be bumped.  In particular rerolling the distfile does not
> automatically require a bump.
ok, I got it.

thanks.