From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 21:58:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1B01065677 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:58:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from bsd.ultra-secure.de (bsd.ultra-secure.de [62.146.20.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25C18FC20 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: (qmail 58119 invoked by uid 89); 14 Mar 2008 21:57:13 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 58099, pid: 58101, t: 3.7539s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.88.7/m:44/d:4673 spam: 3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on bsd.ultra-secure.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.200?) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@217.71.83.52) by bsd.ultra-secure.de with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Mar 2008 21:57:09 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Rainer Duffner Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:55:52 +0100 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johan_Str=F6m?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Smartarray P400i and raid5? X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:58:24 -0000 Am 14.03.2008 um 22:30 schrieb Johan Str=F6m: > Hello list! > > I'm about to get myself a DL360 G5 box with a SmartArray P400i =20 > 256Mb BBWC. I found this thread in the archive: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-proliant/2007-August/=20 > 000297.html > > =46rom the thread one person claims raid5 mode is not very good =20 > without BBWC, but the original poster didn't seem to know if he had =20= > BBWC or not, and the thread died, I'd like to know if this is the =20 > case? > Will raid5 be a bad option on 4x 136Gb 10krpm SAS drives? Main =20 > workload is mysql/apache. > > I've already asked in stable- without a single negative response =20 > (very nice!), but anyone had problems with the 360G5 and FreeBSD 7/=20 > ULE? Any hickups or anything (if you already responded in stable- =20 > then ignore the question :)). > > We run a lot of FreeBSD on HP, but currently there's only one system =20 with FreeBSD7 and it has not been put into production. All the other stuff is on various levels of RELENG_6. We don't see problems. cheers, Rainer --=20 Rainer Duffner CISSP, LPI, MCSE rainer@ultra-secure.de