Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:34:10 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Andrej Zverev <az@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r344316 - in head/net-mgmt: . p5-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk p5-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk/files Message-ID: <20140304123410.GA86186@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <0121329AE40C04B85EBA0ACC@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <CAD5bB%2BiER-D3DzbwwDa_MASmhX75v=9B0VG_=MPNL%2BFWAmD3Rw@mail.gmail.com> <20140304112710.GA63353@FreeBSD.org> <0121329AE40C04B85EBA0ACC@ogg.in.absolight.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:24:36PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 4 mars 2014 11:27:10 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > | I recall the rule was about that newly added ports should not be > | maintained by ports@. Meta-entities like x11@, perl@, python@, etc. make > | sense, and I don't see a problem here (if a port in question is ineeded > | of such a broad interest and/or importance). > > I do, perl@ is a handful of committers, on the top of my head, az, crees, > culot, sunpoet and myself, those are allowed to set the maintainer to > perl@. [...] > > When we got perl@ created way back when, the idea was to have a team for > important Perl stuff, not for maintaining the whole of CPAN. Fair enough; I followed up mostly on the submitter != maintainer question; I did not mean to imply that perl@ should be or is sorta like ports@. ;-) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140304123410.GA86186>