Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:23:32 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which Quake World port to use under FreeBSD 4.0 Message-ID: <20000418092331.A7867@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004181539310.12987-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>; from "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" on Tue Apr 18 15:58:50 GMT 2000 References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004181539310.12987-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Apr 18), Alexey N. Dokuchaev said: > I've been able to find several versions of Quake World 2.30, among > them linux libc5, linux glibc and bsdi ports. > > Maybe there are some source code of qw, so I can compile it on > FreeBSD? You're in luck :) The Quakeforge project is what you're looking for. The version in our ports tree is a bit old, though. Just go to www.quakeforge.net and download one of the qf-current snapshots. > Anyway, the question is: which is better to use from those three? Is > BSDi emulation better that linux's? If you want to use the old binaries, both the BSD/OS and Linux executables work about the same. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000418092331.A7867>