Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:53:14 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/tcpdump Makefile distinfo ports/net/tcpdump/files pkg-message-base Message-ID: <20040119195314.GF71349@saboteur.dek.spc.org> In-Reply-To: <20040119190207.GA54115@madman.celabo.org> References: <200401131757.i0DHvasX096490@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119190207.GA54115@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:02:07PM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> Ugh, I object to the way that ${PORTREVISION} was used here. What
> happens when the port is modified in a way such that ${PORTREVISION}
> must be bumped?
I concur. Fixed. This one crept by me because of ENOFREETIME.
BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040119195314.GF71349>