Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:46:25 -0800 From: "Thomas D. Dean" <tomdean@speakeasy.org> Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org" <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: time_t definition Message-ID: <50F8D3A1.6090104@speakeasy.org> In-Reply-To: <44622vx4ys.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <50F5A189.7000701@speakeasy.org> <20130116120015.3b8d0db4@mr129166> <50F6EDFB.70501@speakeasy.org> <CAHu1Y71L0fuQPgN044-GDr8NBPAo=n%2B6HSBv7Zi%2ByXTceYTZCA@mail.gmail.com> <20130117011721.69799ef6.freebsd@edvax.de> <44622vx4ys.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/17/13 06:24, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > A lot of discussion about what I can do other than understand why gcc does not keep track of the basic typedef. Mayhe the question is beyond this list. Thanks for the replies. Tom Dean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50F8D3A1.6090104>