From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb 11 19:34:22 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5D4A937B50D; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110])
	by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0A00623109; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:17:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id 4103A9F367; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:12:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:42:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: bde@freebsd.org, FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: "fast" interrupt handler threads.
Message-Id: <20020212021231.4103A9F367@okeeffe.bestweb.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Thanks


On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> 
> Yes, anything that reaches doreti checks for ASTs and runs userret() if
> necessary and possible (only for returns to user mode).
> 
> Hmm, this check seems to be inadequate for fast interrupts.  There is
> no check for rescheduling if the return is to kernel mode.

Do you plan on fixing anything you find wrong here?


> 
> Bruce
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message