Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:34:53 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Kenneth Culver <culverk@alpha.yumyumyum.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT Message-ID: <20020315143453.A66190@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020315172221.P30837-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org>; from culverk@alpha.yumyumyum.org on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 05:26:37PM -0500 References: <20020315141913.D63986@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020315172221.P30837-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 05:26:37PM -0500, Kenneth Culver wrote: > > > At the risk of being yelled at, I have a question: Why do we still need to > > > support a.out? I know that a lot of people MIGHT still have some a.out ... > > Rather than offer $0.02, send the patch. > > Well, I was just asking if it is necessary, I'd make a patch if there was > interest. My mail was asking if there is interest. We aren't changing this for GCC 2.95 in 5-CURRENT. PEROID. There is zero reason for subjecting users to this ABI change for what would be gained. If you want to do something productive, submit patches that Bmake GCC 3.1 (which move us to Dwarf2 unwinding as a product). -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020315143453.A66190>