From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Feb 4 04:04:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA26317 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 04:04:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from hp.com (hp.com [15.255.152.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA26288 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 04:04:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from srmail.sr.hp.com by hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA159855436; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 04:03:56 -0800 Received: from hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com by srmail.sr.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA057565435; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 04:03:55 -0800 Received: from mina.sr.hp.com by hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA000975434; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 04:03:54 -0800 Message-Id: <199602041203.AA000975434@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Most stable EISA SCSI controller? Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 04:03:53 -0800 From: Darryl Okahata Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, Does anyone know which EISA SCSI controller is the "most stable" under FreeBSD 2.1R? I need to replace my 1542CF with some EISA controller, and I'd like to know what I should get. Normally, I'd just get an Adaptec 2742. However, the 2940 driver in 2.1R supposedly has problems, and the same ahc driver seems to be used for the 2742. I'm worried about the stability of the 2742/ahc driver in 2.1R. Does anyone have any experience with the Buslogic 747? Is it more stable than the 2742 under 2.1R? [ I wish I could get something based on an NCR 810 or somesuch, but I don't have any PCI slots. Ouch, ouch, ouch. ;-( ] Thanks, -- Darryl Okahata Internet: darrylo@sr.hp.com DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the little green men that have been following him all day.