Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:49:35 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wanted: Testers for an alternate to /usr/obj (as we know it). Message-ID: <199606221749.LAA16502@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <10315.835465689@time.cdrom.com> References: <199606221734.LAA16449@rocky.sri.MT.net> <10315.835465689@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Umm, why would it be any different? The symlink would be for the user > > only. The make system wouldn't even be aware of it's existance. Again, > > this is for *me* to be able to see the contents of the obj directory > > easily. > > Ah.. Well, we can worry about this as an optional enhancement later. > It's not hard to create the symlink from the obj rule. Cool. In any case, I'd be willing to test it if that 'enhancement' was in place. :) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606221749.LAA16502>