Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:05:01 -0400
From:      Chris Brennan <>
Subject:   Re: wpa_cli issues
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080902060401060400090703"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 8/19/2011 10:26 AM, Zane C. B-H. wrote:
> Blarg?
> None of these is even vaguely related to my question about wpa_cli,
> as stated in the subject.

WTF is 'Blarg'?

How about you give us a little more context and offer to converse with
us instead of treating us like machines who blindly spit out answers
(right or wrong, doesn't matter, you've equated us to machines!)

Robert did the best he could with the little bit of information you gave
us. Even after reading your e-mail, I was left wondering what variables
(with in or without wpa_cli) you were talking about and also jumped to
the conclusion of shell environment variables.

A rather blunt note for you (and I've learned this first hand). If you
are rude on an Open Source mailing-list, the chances of you getting help
drop, dramatically. The chances of you getting flamed for your rudeness
become guaranteed.

> Chris Brennan
> --
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> | |
> GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8  9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C)


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>