Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:19:50 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Whats is this? FBSD 4.1 isn't stable!
Message-ID:  <20000920141950.O9141@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009202302550.469-100000@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de>; from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de on Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:08:03PM %2B0200
References:  <20000920135345.M9141@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009202302550.469-100000@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* O. Hartmann <ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de> [000920 14:05] wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Well, sorry, but this is not that kind of doing science by laying hands onto something
> and say: well - its this kind of symptome!
> 
> We develop here equipment for airborne measurement facilities for meteorological
> science and the way we stress things makes me sure, over the time, that a system,
> which has been stressed much more under much more bad conditions do not fail
> in a phase of been not stressed that hard.
> 
> Maybe you're right and I caught some kind of "hardware failure", but surely not
> that kind of failure that we expect due to "overheating" the CPUs. The machine here
> in front of me is much better air conditioned thatn other systems I stressed.

please read this:
  http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/

Try not to talk to me like I don't know what I'm talking about.

And don't forget about the email formatting. :)

thanks,
-Alfred


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000920141950.O9141>