Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:13:05 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Istv=C3=A1n?= <leccine@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Hongtao Yin <htyin@huawei.com>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Brent Jones <brent@servuhome.net> Subject: Re: Comparison of FreeBSD/Linux TCP Throughput performance Message-ID: <b8592ed80910200113q6a31a32cqe2ce09e5b9e04d2e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <d763ac660910191939y2416535ck6e2c351a3f329677@mail.gmail.com> References: <78DB4AE8EF5F4A1EBD3992D7404B2725@china.huawei.com> <d763ac660910180755i7f6fd3c7q8578bfed11978b9d@mail.gmail.com> <ee9f3b480910181305x5c8661a7mb7bfdd2ddd0a267d@mail.gmail.com> <d763ac660910181836p45aedc37v1c77f5e96b6df13b@mail.gmail.com> <b8592ed80910191716v11b978c1i8bf82170e4ed6a37@mail.gmail.com> <d763ac660910191939y2416535ck6e2c351a3f329677@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i see but there was no debt that it is possible. at least from my side :_) On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > 2009/10/20 Istv=C3=A1n <leccine@gmail.com>: > > > > therefore i like netpipe runs you can see the performance and the laten= cy > as > > well using the packet size as your "x" axis, i think it makes more sens= e > > then just 1 number > > My point was to demonstrate that saturating gigabit ethernet is very > doable with FreeBSD, and his limitation is more likely somewhere other > than "TCP". > > I've told him privately to check CPU utilisation. I'll do the same on > my boxes when I get some time; I'd like to know why I'm only seeing ~ > 800mbit with large buffers. > --=20 the sun shines for all http://l1xl1x.blogspot.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b8592ed80910200113q6a31a32cqe2ce09e5b9e04d2e>