Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:01:07 -0800
From:      David Brodbeck <gull@gull.us>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: fbsd safety of the ports
Message-ID:  <CAHhngE3D0dyt6_xUT9eU7cj2vDc2T8qp3jg4=PuVzkKSP79pMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <08DB354F-6604-4B28-8AE9-E6B40FE87A96@olivent.com>
References:  <4F300FCD.8070804@nagual.nl> <CAHhngE0Y1hFQv4dUvaKFz68kwNWERAAJKpirTV0bvAiPmPx_aA@mail.gmail.com> <6F081A41-0EA8-4DB4-8FB9-F2E9A75EC948@olivent.com> <C2DEE7E606ECCC2C0AE91F2D@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <08DB354F-6604-4B28-8AE9-E6B40FE87A96@olivent.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:54 PM, mikel king <mikel.king@olivent.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, WP isn't exactly a well designed CMS form the untaring standpoint.

Most aren't.  TWiki is a nightmare to update, basically requiring you
to copy your old content to a new install and then hand-merge the new
system preference pages with any modifications you've made.  After
dealing with that repeatedly I decided maybe the less secure WordPress
approach had something to recommend it.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHhngE3D0dyt6_xUT9eU7cj2vDc2T8qp3jg4=PuVzkKSP79pMg>