From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 20 23:18:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DBD93E for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 23:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D86CF15A4 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 23:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbyr2 with SMTP id yr2so115622754igb.0 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 16:18:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neosmart.net; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=qp0GHckjmrTbGgg3bx7rJTOsGGm6/ZfZrcQHcitwKXA=; b=M2V8iGYGR+7WGjqBN4Tb+YohKkdPjfHvRRcXWEPclfZD7m/db+TVft1tynv7r5W2xH g72Fn5mpP90zKUM4GwNIdM3wSScJoKRfkSss3gK8JmvS944CiS/CwIkYEP9DQTwhSsaV f6mAdVKQWY2xjGO7MMP5f2yFsb9wFYlh8kvY0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :subject:message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=qp0GHckjmrTbGgg3bx7rJTOsGGm6/ZfZrcQHcitwKXA=; b=Ci4o77DWHFjjwTjFdFRspDF27IhhnnigFXRmy2ajVolhTkIsrzbYUlTgOLNvdcwylC yMWTXowYrwlCtLfvxd79ERhpaEC5rvIhNinA0+8TIZ6bUxBkhPmxNFBKfCK77mnVRaFO 2q3/6zpZ6smqN65rqqWkAlMHrwNOCGYQdNtIdX8Os0PqqIunPjX2T10G3MbovVp5KvkH +SafJ9o8nOLKklphgd/1hqPtcLvx1N1MMZ/oFvgnK5lfyDYNplDv07WaiFziwmwzpVZC P9LjVQy1rIxosytq2hplUu4gXLSnx3F6CIDiyctsaKWRp5BEJ6tSDr3YdVajusVNBN80 kvzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkT19JcQvfRyNQviHYPfcUReFsDD5fqJwaMeJ4qoLb49plpZn77lQ421VLEwzAil6sQM945 X-Received: by 10.50.66.234 with SMTP id i10mr385251igt.22.1432163905219; Wed, 20 May 2015 16:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:249:e00:ac50::12a5? ([2601:249:e00:ac50::12a5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e69sm13466886ioe.11.2015.05.20.16.18.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 May 2015 16:18:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Mahmoud Al-Qudsi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Status of NFS4.1 FS_RECLAIM in FreeBSD 10.1? Message-Id: <44D62B59-1ABE-4FC3-9E29-39478A94703E@neosmart.net> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:18:20 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 23:18:26 -0000 Hello, I have not delved too deeply into either the NFS spec or the FreeBSD = nfsd code, but from my admittedly-limited understanding, it seems that = reclaim is both a mandatory feature and one that is present in the current FreeBSD = NFS v4.1 implementation. Is my understanding of this correct? My reason for asking is when attempting to migrate an ESXi server to a = FreeBSD NFSv4.1 datastore, ESXi throws the following error: > WARNING: NFS41: NFS41FSCompleteMount:3601: RECLAIM_COMPLETE FS failed: = Not > supported; forcing read-only operation VMware ESXi 6.0 is able to mount NFSv4.1 shares exported from other=20 operating systems, so I figured I would ask here on the list before = digging out a copy of tcpdump and going down that rabbit hole. I can mount and use NFSv3 shares just fine with ESXi from this same = server, and=20 can mount the same shares as NFSv4 from other clients (e.g. OS X) as = well. Thanks, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi NeoSmart Technologies