From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 19:43:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163DC16A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EC243FCB for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:43:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAM3gwvF015218; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:42:58 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:42:58 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031122.124258.846933044.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <20031114015735.GA99126@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> References: <20031114015735.GA99126@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems Building OpenOffice 1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 03:43:10 -0000 Hi, Peter > [Please copy me on any replies] > > I'm trying to build OpenOffice-1.1 on a 4.9-prerelease system and it gets > right to the end and then reports > > WARNING! Project(s): > gtk > > not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts. > ----------- > > I haven't checked to see it if will install and run yet. > > Looking at Makefile v1.110, it appears to depend on both gtk1.2 and gtk2.0: > BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${X11BASE}/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/gtk20 > USE_GNOME= orbit gtk12 > This seems somewhat wierd. Shouldn't it depend on only one version of gtk? > If so, which? This is really wired thing. there was long history for it. Yes I know about it. but it has already been fixed in 2.0 builds. Regards, maho