Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:34:41 -0700
From:      "Meagan Jia Pi" <meagan@e-lingo.com>
To:        "Linh Pham" <lplist@q.closedsrc.org>, "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@nwlink.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Backup Solution
Message-ID:  <06cc01bff65e$9d954f30$e293c83f@meagan>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007251016110.5286-100000@q.closedsrc.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

----- Original Message -----
From: "Linh Pham" <lplist@q.closedsrc.org>
To: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@nwlink.com>
Cc: "Meagan Jia Pi" <meagan@e-lingo.com>; <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Backup Solution


> On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Jason C. Wells wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Meagan Jia Pi wrote:
> >
> > > Currently I am only doing backups using DLT 7000 on critical machines
> > > (AIT seems better with bigger capacity and cheaper price?), as you
know,
> > > it will become a big problem as the company grows or when I make a
false
> > > judgment on which machines are critical.  Scalability and reliability
> > > are very important to us.  Using jukboxes seems to be a very good
> > > solution. Has any of you have experience with using juckboxes?
> >
> > I would use amanda no matter what hardware I chose. To be fair I do not
> > know about commercial solutions that may exist. Also, if you have a slow
> > link anywhere in between your hosts a networked backup solution may be
> > problematic.
> >
> > With Amanda's scheduling capability you might even find that a robot is
> > not really necessary, depending on your total disc usage among all
hosts.
> > E.g.  Assuming a week long dump cycle with a 70GB DLT with hardware
> > compression you could handle 490 GB (minus a fudge factor) of allocated
> > disc.
> >
>
> Autoloaders are handy if you have to backup a lot of storage and need to
> span across multiple tapes (and don't want to babysit the backup). But if
> you don't have a lot of stuff to back up, or if the data is highly
> compressible, a standard tape drive should be fine.
>
> If redundancy is crucial, you may want to install a tape drive in each
> machine. This will reduce the need to backup across the network and in
> case one drive goes down, you can use another drive in the other machine
> to do a network backup. The downside to this method is the higher up-front
> cost.
>
> For our datacenter, we have a 22-slot DLT IV autoloader connected to a
> Windows 2000 machine (shh! I know, I know!!!) using Veritas Backup
> Exec. It works great for our Windows servers, but doesn't work with the
> BSD servers that run Samba.

Why didn't you choose AIT?

Thanks!
Meagan



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?06cc01bff65e$9d954f30$e293c83f>