Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:20:03 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/25286: mkisofs-1.13 core dump. Message-ID: <200102221720.f1MHK3W20426@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/25286; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Stefan `Sec` Zehl <sec@yoda.fwe.pi.musin.de> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, schilling@fokus.gmd.de, dirk@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/25286: mkisofs-1.13 core dump. Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:16:23 +0200 On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 06:03:35PM +0100, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote: > > >Number: 25286 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: mkisofs-1.13 core dump. > >Originator: Stefan `Sec` Zehl > >Release: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386 > > mkisofs-1.13 built on an FreeBSD-4.2 system from the ports > > >Description: > > mkisofs cores when generating iso's with more than a few bytes. > > I traced this down to a segmentation fault in __dtoa. This occures when > mkisofs tries to ouput the: > " 2.60% done, estimate finish Thu Feb 22 17:56:16 2001" > message. > > After much debugging, I found out that mkisofs uses a wrong prototype for > the __dtoa function. After I corrected it, and the two offending calls, > it now works fine. > > <de>Das kommt davon wenn man nicht-oeffentliche Funktionen benutzt > *seufz*</de> This sounds like something related to the recent __dtoa() and *printf() cleanup. It would be best if your patch were applied conditionally, probably conditional on OSVERSION. Should some recent __FreeBSD_version bump be used (I think the last one was quite a while ago..), or should we wait for 4.3-RELEASE and use its new __FreeBSD_version instead? G'luck, Peter -- I am jealous of the first word in this sentence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102221720.f1MHK3W20426>