From owner-freebsd-scsi Tue May 19 22:24:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA15266 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Tue, 19 May 1998 22:24:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from priscilla.mu.org (paul@priscilla.mu.org [206.156.231.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA15259 for ; Tue, 19 May 1998 22:24:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@priscilla.mu.org) Received: (from paul@localhost) by priscilla.mu.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA17789; Wed, 20 May 1998 00:23:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from paul) Message-ID: <19980520002333.A17764@mu.org> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 00:23:34 -0500 From: Paul Saab To: "Kenneth D. Merry" Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CAM/stable/BT-958 questions References: <19980519194530.A16812@mu.org> <199805200431.WAA25425@panzer.plutotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199805200431.WAA25425@panzer.plutotech.com>; from Kenneth D. Merry on Tue, May 19, 1998 at 10:31:42PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kenneth D. Merry (ken@plutotech.com) wrote: > Paul Saab wrote... > > > > When I run camcontrol -l under -stable I get this... > > camcontrol: cam_real_open_device: Path Inquiry CCB failed > > cam_real_open_device: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > What it's telling you is that for some reason, the CAMIOCOMMAND > ioctl definition in camcontrol isn't the same as the CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl > definition in the kernel. > > Do you by any chance have some old CAM headers lying around > somewhere? They'd be in /usr/include/cam/... This is the first time I installed CAM, so I don't think I have any old headers around. Other than not being able to use camcontrol, I have been pleased with how it is functioning. Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message