Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:07:22 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Stephen McKay <mckay@thehub.com.au> Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xfree4 by default? Message-ID: <3C334C5A.A5E56055@mindspring.com> References: <20011231183928.F37696@bsd.havk.org> <78699.1009878927@winston.freebsd.org> <200201021425.g02EPks11288@dungeon.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen McKay wrote: > >It wouldn't be that hard in sysinstall either, depending on how > >the X bits are packaged. FWIW, I also think that XFree86 4.x's time > >has come. > > None of my current video cards work properly with 3.3.6, so I'm all for > adding 4.1.0 immediately, rather than post release. Any chance? Yeah. Why isn't "X" a _package_ instead of a weird-ass tarball? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C334C5A.A5E56055>