From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 17 13:16:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C69416A4CE; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:16:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173E843D3F; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:16:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id 6EDC0ACAE3; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:16:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:16:12 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Message-ID: <20040817131612.GT30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <200408161043.i7GAhfXs079045@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040817004407.GA81257@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20040817074633.GO30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040817112900.GA31635@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20040817124020.GK88156@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3a/Z8KDuKqDOIvAo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040817124020.GK88156@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 cc: Wilko Bulte cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:16:14 -0000 --3a/Z8KDuKqDOIvAo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:10:20PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: +> On the contrary. RAID-3 requires byte-level striping, which is +> ridiculous on the hardware that FreeBSD supports. And RAID5 isn't? So what's the difference? RAID3 requires 2^n+1 components where n >=3D 1, so minimum is 3. +> [...] I suspect that pjd +> is confusing RAID-3 with RAID-4. And RAID-4 has no advantages +> whatsoever over RAID-5. I'm not confusing RAID3 with RAID4. This is RAID3 and it works well. Want to compare performance with vinum's RAID5?:) And RAID3 has many advantages over RAID5. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --3a/Z8KDuKqDOIvAo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBIgUcForvXbEpPzQRArG6AJ0Zb50B2apw2OPYOFnHq1iM6LIETwCfWn2f hKi2OvmV+r656XVmIvcfynM= =Y5dd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3a/Z8KDuKqDOIvAo--