From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 00:37:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329B816A421; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:37:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FE643D62; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:37:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6M0awKs001456; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:36:58 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6M0ava4001455; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:36:58 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:36:57 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20050722003657.GA1415@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Robert Watson , "M. Warner Losh" , marcolz@stack.nl, wpaul@windriver.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20050721134816.GA8550@nagual.pp.ru> <20050721142445.GA77847@stack.nl> <20050721143443.GB10010@nagual.pp.ru> <20050721.091844.10574798.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050721152946.GA11578@nagual.pp.ru> <20050722011804.O16902@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050722011804.O16902@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: marcolz@stack.nl, wpaul@windriver.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:37:15 -0000 On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:20:46AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > FYI, most locking bugs in network interfaces that I've seen don't result > in a spontaneous reboot, and that's a somewhat worrying symptom. Is this > something you can easily reproduce in a short period of time, or in > particular, using a particular program or system call? Is there any > chance your box has firewire and you can use a firewire debugger to > inspect memory? I can't reproduce it, it happens after few hours running. Perhaps the problem is not in rl(4) and making it GIANT only mask the problem. I have spare hardware to swith to and experiment and I'll see what happens. -- http://ache.pp.ru/