Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:11:48 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [releng_8_2 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc
Message-ID:  <86wr84j9az.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <4F2B278A.3080502@m5p.com> (George Mitchell's message of "Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:17:14 -0500")
References:  <201202022037.q12Kb66S041860@freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca> <4F2B278A.3080502@m5p.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> writes:
> Apparently two or three people have all recently checked in code
> without first verifying that it compiled (let alone ran), or else
> possibly did not completely commit their changes, and then absconded
> to a place where they fail to receive these emails about the problems.
> Can someone please either diagnose these errors or else revert the
> deficient commits?

These are old bugs that nobody noticed because they're in code that the
tinderbox didn't use to build.  They're in releng branches, so fixing
them requires re@ and / or so@ approval.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wr84j9az.fsf>