From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 16:34:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B24628A for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 332353729 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7MGYqsA041713; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:34:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <53F7712C.5080807@qeng-ho.org> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:34:52 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: solid state drives? References: <53F22E89.3050005@rcn.com> <53F2399D.5050609@hiwaay.net> <20140822170112.69830ad9@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20140822170112.69830ad9@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:34:56 -0000 On 22/08/2014 17:01, RW wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:36:29 -0500 > William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > >> None of the SSD's are/will be as durable as spinning drives for >> writes .... That said, the SLC type are more durable than MLC or >> TLC .... Also more $$$$ & usually only available in smaller sizes. >> Good for a root drive, i.e. mostly read-olny operations. Swap & >> everything else on spinning platters .... > > A typical modern 120GB MLC SSD will have a specified write endurance of > around 8TB which is equivalent to 1GB a day for 22 years. They should > be fine for most things where there's nothing doing heavy duty writing. The stated write endurances appear to be very conservative as well. The Tech Report web site has been hammering a variety of SSDs and only started getting actual failures after the 600TB mark, with some still working after 1PB of writes. http://techreport.com/review/26523/the-ssd-endurance-experiment-casualties-on-the-way-to-a-petabyte YMMV of course.