Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:09:15 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc group master.passwd Message-ID: <p0621025abece20e9d8f4@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <86is0nzdz1.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <001801c56ae1$15d05d90$0a2a15ac@SMILEY> <86slzvcfb0.fsf@xps.des.no> <p06210257bece101be886@[128.113.24.47]> <86is0nzdz1.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 6:34 PM +0200 6/9/05, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> writes: >> What do we care if the first letter is an underscore? What is so >> frightening about '_' that we *must* not use it? This seems like a >> reasonable convention to me, whether or not we happened to start it. > >I don't mind conventions, even foreign ones. What I mind is mixing >them. If we want to adopt this convention, then we should adopt it >consistently, and add leading underscores to all our system accounts. Hmm. Actually after re-reading my message (the part that you quoted above), I wanted to add that I did *not* mean to imply that we should change all our other accounts to match this convention, even though my message does sound like I meant that. I just meant that "_" should be seen just like any other letter. If the openbsd folks used the convention of having an 'o' as the first letter of every account they added, then we would just import their packages and use the same o-based account that they originally picked. We would neither care that it began with an 'o', nor would we change all our own historical userids to start them with an 'o'. My position is that we should treat '_' no different than any other valid letter. I don't see much to be gained by changing our other accounts to *add* the '_', since our users are already used to us shipping with those other account names. There may be many scripts or other processes which already have those userids/group-names embedded in them. I don't object to the idea if others are for it, but I don't see that it is worth the trouble either. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn =3D gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0621025abece20e9d8f4>