From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar  4 17:13:16 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: python@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A571065674
	for <python@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Mar 2011 17:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lwhsu@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw)
Received: from FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw (FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw [140.113.17.209])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF218FC14
	for <python@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Mar 2011 17:13:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1058)
	id 45D1661E51; Sat,  5 Mar 2011 01:13:15 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 01:13:15 +0800
From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org>
To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20110304171315.GA32391@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: python@freebsd.org
Subject: Fwd: What's the perfered name for zope related modules?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues <freebsd-python.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-python@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python>,
	<mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:13:16 -0000


--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello portmgr,

Since there is no feedback (to my question) on freebsd-python list (CC'd),
I would like to listen the opinion from portmgr about the best naming of
these ports, perhaps we need a regexp about "valid package name" in the
porter's handbook?

Regards,
Li-Wen

----- Forwarded message from Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> -----

Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:50:45 +0800
=46rom: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org>
To: python@freebsd.org
Subject: What's the perfered name for zope related modules?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hello all,

I'm working on www/py-pyramid port, which needs some other zope ports to
be added.  And I found we have following naming in the tree:

 - py-zopeInterface
 - py-zope.exceptions
 - py-zopetesting

=46rom [1], first one is not suggested, though we have many in the tree.
And I am not sure '.' would affect the other parts, but if it does,
it should already caused problem since we have also ports like
openoffice.org php-mode.el in tree.  If not, I like second one because
third one could cause other naming conflicts.

Regards,
Li-Wen

[1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.ht=
ml#PORTING-PKGNAME

--=20
Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu AT FreeBSD.org>
http://lwhsu.org



----- End forwarded message -----

--=20
Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu AT FreeBSD.org>
http://lwhsu.org

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1xHaoACgkQQWsOOSiXsii7bwCfeBBByTHThO7TyK9N7IKi0v04
9qoAnjOFeMtQE3BNZ27meQB7t+6epCGo
=brS8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--