From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 13 15:31:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B0316A4CE for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:31:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gatekeeper.isp.net.au (gatekeeper.isp.net.au [203.31.238.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE3443D45 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:31:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@mark.net.au) Received: from localhost (localhost.isp.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by gatekeeper.isp.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4083F3E3324; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:31:26 +1100 (EST) Received: from gatekeeper.isp.net.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gatekeeper.isp.net.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26967-03; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:31:24 +1100 (EST) Received: from juana.isp.net.au (juana.isp.net.au [203.31.238.30]) by gatekeeper.isp.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD8B3E3322; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:31:24 +1100 (EST) Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:31:24 +1100 (EST) From: Mark Russell X-X-Sender: mark@juana.isp.net.au To: Richard Coleman In-Reply-To: <41962847.1090608@criticalmagic.com> Message-ID: <20041114022940.F60099@juana.isp.net.au> References: <20041113101925.GB70256@voodoo.oberon.net> <20041114003532.L60099@juana.isp.net.au> <41962847.1090608@criticalmagic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at isp.net.au cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Kirill Ponomarew Subject: Re: HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:31:27 -0000 On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Richard Coleman wrote: > Mark Russell wrote: >> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: >>> Since CVS version of INDEX was always out-dated, portmgr decided to >>> remove it from CVS tree. You will still be able to build your own >>> INDEX or use 'fetchindex' target in /usr/ports/. >> >> please back this out, it breaks things, I've never found an out of >> date index to be a problem, now not havign an index is causing >> problems, also the extra bandwidth for fetch index is a hassle. >> >> at least let the issue be discused on the list. > > Just change your cvsup script to rebuild INDEX[-5] afterwards. That's what I > do. The change is fine with me. on trees that are mounted -ro this barfs, on my p120 which does my personal mail and updates virus defs every 2 hours its dead in the water. -- All of my life was a laugh and a joke, a drink and a smoke and then I passed out on the floor