From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 24 18:20:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087A616A4CE
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:20:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD41C43D31
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:20:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6OIKDJw033542
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:20:13 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6OIKDNj033541;
	Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:20:13 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:20:13 GMT
Message-Id: <200407241820.i6OIKDNj033541@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net>
Subject: Re: kern/68698: vinum(4) broken in 5.2-current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:20:18 -0000

The following reply was made to PR kern/68698; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net>
To: GNATS Bug Followup <bug-followup@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: kern/68698: vinum(4) broken in 5.2-current
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:15:51 +0200

 I can confirm that setting start_cmd="mount /;vinum start"
 in /etc/rc.d/vinum is a workaround. The panic is gone.
 
 So it appears that "vinum start" has gained the prerequisite of a
 mounted rootfs... Can vinum experts confirm or deny this?
 Could automounting / if it's missing be added to "vinum start"
 or is this the wrong way to fix the issue?
 
 	Jens