From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 7 9: 6:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C175F37B71B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:06:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA89026; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 12:06:40 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010304165708.A40747@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <004601c0a503$4ef3a850$0300a8c0@magus> <20010304165708.A40747@mollari.cthul.hu> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 12:06:39 -0500 To: Kris Kennaway , William Wong From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Keeping track of Changes? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 4:57 PM -0800 3/4/01, Kris Kennaway wrote: >Well, it varies according to developer - but given the number of >un-merged changes that I found in the tree last night the general >answer might be "they don't" :-) Note that if you're casting your eye into usr.sbin/lpr territory, be careful about what you MFC. The recent INET6-releated update turns it into something which does not link under -stable, so don't rush to MFC things there... [which is to say, some of us don't MFC things because we know they WON'T work...] I do intend to fix that update, because I do not intend to leave lpr as "-current only" for the indefinite future. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message