Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:21:13 -0500
From:      "Otter" <otterr@telocity.com>
To:        "Zaitsau, Andrei" <AZaitsau@panasonicfa.com>, "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: NAT question
Message-ID:  <HLEDJBJKDDPDJBMGCLPPKEANCKAA.otterr@telocity.com>
In-Reply-To: <054F7DAA9E54D311AD090008C74CE9BD01F1E6D3@exchange.panasonicfa.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


}-----Original Message-----
}From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
}[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of
}Zaitsau, Andrei
}Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 4:13 PM
}To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
}Subject: NAT question
}
}
}I am using NAT on a gateway connected to the internet. 2
}Computers are
}connected to the gateway(192.168.0.1) with addresses 192.168.0.2 and
}192.168.0.3, is it possible manually block NAT(disconnect
}from internet)
} for computer with 192.168.0.3 , while second host
}192.168.0.2 will be still
}alive(connected to the internet)?

Yep. Depending on what you're using, (ipfw,ipf, etc) modify the
appropriate rules.

}Is it possible to limit bandwidth for users connected to gateway?

Yep. man dummynet. man quota if you want to limit drive space too.
-Otter



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?HLEDJBJKDDPDJBMGCLPPKEANCKAA.otterr>