From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 9 08:16:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E077106566B for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meslists@yahoo.fr) Received: from smtp137.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp137.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [77.238.184.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE9B98FC21 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meslists@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 65242 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 08:16:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=gp69+KWW6i1VNGAdEZkOHBzG4XNWLH1gGJHKKRfJLUOfakNuQEos1UocIoCnZF+WgrWMmILmdxb1adcYEZX4ve57937GuE3Ij6BwpK01PoEdUhryT/dwZBr3OT4DYwco416i7Djsk3cGx04vP/a2P5MP//618h3aOxgALwfbr4I= ; Received: from unknown (HELO suer) (meslists@151.49.229.169 with plain) by smtp137.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 08:16:48 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: vQQ_Xl6swBCl_II246m4P1b5oVD4 X-YMail-OSG: Y90AbGMVM1nLXAX.IKEexQe44mZ4vsLGEBUVwh8.Wx8XQ9Fk0AyKaz5g.nEsQLmB9kqn6Hhsi40Zrj178LFLNP_2ziEqCw5QzJ.7Gqk4M7aVHe4gF7MC9yMQY0ajj6VxQx7S11Ewu8qQJ.t5o3c8OPEVu36JmEVVQpwbinG9OEHjnKdEgioP2bCpb.1fsDUDyHSU8fbeCMM_Ua7ZtuxH6zLv.uf8Cn1_ppfzAdwn1JUCejNs5Kp.foN2kZF8H7kxRI3juc7Eiytbhq2saDDLyi80e6bz.t0NK_yswFuSJCrEdzxYwabA X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: dan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:15:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090708222041.470ad9e1@gumby.homeunix.com> <20090708234414.GA62881@osiris.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20090708234414.GA62881@osiris.chen.org.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907091015.58852.meslists@yahoo.fr> Cc: RW , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: portupgrade question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: meslists@yahoo.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:16:50 -0000 On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:44:14 Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200 > > > > Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote: > > > > THat's the point ! > > > > > > > > isnt that -R implied by -N ? > > > > > > > > From the portupgrade man page > > > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > -N > > > > --new > > > > Install a new port/package when a specified package is not > > > > installed. Prior to the installation a new port/package, all the > > > > required packages are upgraded. > > > > > > No. Since the dependant package *is* installed. It's just not up > > > to date. > > > > I don't understand what you're are saying here. My reading of the > > manpage is the same as Dan's: when you install kdeadmin with > > portupgrade -N, everything that kdeadmin requires will be upgraded i.e. > > "brought up to date". > > My mistake. It may be a regression with portupgrade; or just that the > feature in the second sentence has never been implemented due to the > overlap with -R Ah, I will send anemail to the maintainer, then. Let's investigate a bit more ! ;-) Many Thanks for your answers! d