Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:59:24 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: STABLE <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: proper way to make kernel... Message-ID: <20010321205923.A1882@student.uu.se> In-Reply-To: <3AB90248.90163161@mediaone.net>; from ericmlogan@mediaone.net on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:34:32AM -0800 References: <3AB90248.90163161@mediaone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:34:32AM -0800, Eric M Logan wrote: > Hi everyone. Is it normal to have "make kernel KERNCONF=something" > produce a smaller kernel than "config something, cd > ../../compile/something, make depend, make, make install"? And if so, > why is the former not the preferred way to compile a personalized > kernel? Thanks. > I think both ways should create identical kernelfiles. (Except when the second, older, method doesn't work.) And besides, the former (using KERNCONF) *is* the preferred way to compile a kernel. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010321205923.A1882>