Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:28:37 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-embedded <freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: MALTA config for QEMU instance Message-ID: <7734B04C-96D0-46E7-88EA-4900F281DEBC@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonOxULE1b6-DUWZeeEYttai%2BUbU3w7Ci7_1ahWwxG49xw@mail.gmail.com> References: <1380584013.60262.3.camel@localhost> <2045FA99-8B0B-4083-9920-52E94DA6ABAD@bsdimp.com> <CAJ-VmonOxULE1b6-DUWZeeEYttai%2BUbU3w7Ci7_1ahWwxG49xw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Not until we have a good LINT kernel for mips. Until then, we should = make MALTA le and MALTA64 be. Warner On Oct 3, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > +1 >=20 > Should we create MALTA LE and BE variants? >=20 >=20 >=20 > -adrian >=20 >=20 > On 1 October 2013 08:56, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >=20 > On Sep 30, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: >=20 > > I've finally gotten a stable qemu image for mips running and will be > > trying out various things for ports. > > > > I note that the MALTA config specifies a ROOTDEVNAME that doesn't = seem > > to be a buildable configuration. > > e.g. options ROOTDEVNAME=3D\"ufs:ada0s1a\" > > > > Does it make sense to create a new kernel conf for this emulated = MALTA > > support or does it make sense to figure out how to make a image that = can > > be booted via this root device? >=20 > Just commit it. This config file has always been for emulation. I = missed my window to get a real MALTA board years ago, so have never = tried it on real hardware. >=20 > Warner >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-embedded > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-embedded-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7734B04C-96D0-46E7-88EA-4900F281DEBC>