Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:00:28 +0700 From: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Paul Procacci <pprocacci@datapipe.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NanoBSD :: smallest image size Message-ID: <5635aa0d0902190800s7c3b5ec2qfa894618aa4cc554@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090219164957.G46777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <499D67B6.60309@datapipe.com> <20090219161505.X46627@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <499D7F0B.7000307@datapipe.com> <20090219164957.G46777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
even so, im not so sure alot of people with to run a full install on a firewall, for various reasons. If I was doing it, Id go with a CF card, or USB, though age of system might make that unreliable. even pfsense can run straight off cdrom, makes a decent option also. On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > Yeah, I realize it's more powerful than necessary to handle the >> task...though my current firewall/router is a 860+ Mhz PIII w/ 128 Megs of >> ram. So, this would be a downgrade for my current firewall/router which >> allows me to repurpose the existing machine for something more >> computationally expensive. >> > > so - downgrade. FreeBSD easily runs (full, not stripped) on 32MB RAM > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5635aa0d0902190800s7c3b5ec2qfa894618aa4cc554>