Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:46:05 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Message-ID: <20191010224605.GA86932@koitsu.org> In-Reply-To: <20191010031339.GA69497@icarus.home.lan> References: <20191010031339.GA69497@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 08:13:39PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Now we can get back on the ipv6 option.
> >
> > so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or without
> > ipv6 for the ports side. Please speak up in reply to this email, if you are
> > building without ipv6, why are you doing so, what are the real benefit for it.
> > How bad it will impact you if we do remove that option?
>
> Whenever I use ports over FreeBSD-provided packages (or to use ports to
> build my own packages), I often disable IPV6 support. The lengthy
> response below should explain why.
> {brevity snip}
This was sent to the wrong mailing list; was intended for -ports.
Sorry for the noise.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org |
| UNIX Systems Administrator PGP 0x2A389531 |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20191010224605.GA86932>