From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:22:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A2516A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:22:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E70F43D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:22:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AgTAv-000CoD-TT; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:22:01 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:22:01 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Josef El-Rayes Message-ID: <20040113182201.GA48706@voodoo.oberon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , Josef El-Rayes , "Jonathan T. Sage" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <400409F4.3090205@freebsd.org> <400428DC.2060108@theatre.msu.edu> <20040113181911.GB432@jenny.daemon.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040113181911.GB432@jenny.daemon.li> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew cc: "Jonathan T. Sage" cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:22:20 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > "Jonathan T. Sage" wrote: > > 1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and=20 > > therefore dropped immediatally. this sort of report is handled=20 > > wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate=20 > > what he has done > why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area > should be covered here too.=20 As Jonathan said, the freshports is the best site where you can get all issues about it. -Kirill --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABDdJQC1G6a60JuURAv+XAKDVwS9UAflgdJFKfciQkWV6l94LagCglYa/ aWiz8wsNuQ01QH1t1tRcMTA= =pqFq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--