From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 23:00:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140A537B401 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 23:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE96743F85 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 23:00:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4C60RUp071094 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 23:00:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4C60RX5071093; Sun, 11 May 2003 23:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 23:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200305120600.h4C60RX5071093@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Valentin Nechayev Subject: Re: kern/51016: kernel panic: ufsdirhash_lookup: bad offset in hash array X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Valentin Nechayev List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 06:00:29 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/51016; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Valentin Nechayev To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/51016: kernel panic: ufsdirhash_lookup: bad offset in hash array Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 08:59:18 +0300 Sun, May 11, 2003 at 21:04:39, tedm wrote about "RE: kern/51016: kernel panic: ufsdirhash_lookup: bad offset in hash array": > As previously stated I have run leafnode with no ill effects. Do > you run leafnode or have you seen this same panic elsewhere? If not, > could you please install leafnode and see if you can get it to panic > your system so that we can get some confirmation that this is > reproducible on different systems? I don't use leafnode and don't want to use it (I prefer INN and mailnews gate). Sorry, but there are no reason for me to run it, and even whether I go to install it, configuration possibly will be quite different from one of PR initiator. The only thing I wanted to see is avoidness of "You are the only who sees this bug, so it doesn't exist". You are right in intention to get leafnode config and other important details. -netch-