Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 02:31:48 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: do we still need ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep_stub.c ? Message-ID: <20020803023148.A94525@iguana.icir.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
just got the following panic with today's -current sources and
an oldish config file (one not having "options SOFTUPDATES"):
panic: softdep_slowdown called
Debugger("panic")
Stopped at Debugger+0x45: xchgl %ebx,0xc05fa740
db> trace
Debugger(c026141c) at Debugger+0x45
panic(c026ecc1,c66e1b94,c01ff565,c1cda000,0) at panic+0x7c
softdep_slowdown(c1cda000,0,0,ffffffff,2) at softdep_slowdown+0xd
ffs_truncate(c1cda000,0,0,c00,0) at ffs_truncate+0x81
ufs_inactive(c66e1bfc,c66e1c24,c01b2c10,c66e1bfc,c0280780) at ufs_inactive+0x91
ufs_vnoperate(c66e1bfc) at ufs_vnoperate+0x13
vput(c1cda000,c1cc636c,c66e1c90,ffffffdf,c1c92000) at vput+0xd0
unlink(c081db40,c66e1d14,1,3,246) at unlink+0x18a
syscall(2f,2f,2f,8254000,bfbffdc8) at syscall+0x231
Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1d
and in trying to track down the problem i noticed the following:
> grep ffs_softdep conf/*
conf/files:ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c optional softupdates ffs
conf/files:ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep_stub.c optional ffs
so the question is, do we still need ffs_softdep_stub.c ? In any
case, getting an explicit panic does not really sound right...
cheers
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020803023148.A94525>