Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 02 Aug 2014 12:13:37 +0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
To:        krad <kraduk@gmail.com>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
Message-ID:  <53DC6571.1080202@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALfReyerXQm6ehhtKXcJ9XD5fr=0LBShtD8EAUjd9p07xcQvjw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <53C706C9.6090506@com.jkkn.dk> <6326AB9D-C19A-434B-9681-380486C037E2@lastsummer.de> <53CB4736.90809@bluerosetech.com> <201407200939020335.0017641F@smtp.24cl.home> <788274E2-7D66-45D9-89F6-81E8C2615D14@lastsummer.de> <201407201230590265.00B479C4@smtp.24cl.home> <20140729103512.GC89995@FreeBSD.org> <53DA304E.6020105@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20140731134147.GH2402@glebius.int.ru> <CALfReyerXQm6ehhtKXcJ9XD5fr=0LBShtD8EAUjd9p07xcQvjw@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 8/1/14, 3:39 PM, krad wrote:
> I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf.
> Looking at the man page it doesnt seem to have changed. I should probably
> give it another go though as it has been about 10 years now
since ipfw now has a 'nat' keyword you might say that is has changed 
in that 10 years.
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53DC6571.1080202>