Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Jun 1998 11:28:22 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Bob Willcox <bob@luke.pmr.com>
Cc:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, shimon@simon-shapiro.org, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>, tcobb <tcobb@staff.circle.net>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
Subject:   Re: DPT driver fails and panics with Degraded Array 
Message-ID:  <199806031828.LAA00592@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 03 Jun 1998 07:32:00 CDT." <19980603073200.A16652@pmr.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 12:54:43PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > On Mon,  1 June 1998 at 20:51:51 -0400, Simon Shapiro wrote:
> > > On 29-May-98 Mike Smith wrote:
> > >
> > >>> I am routinely running a Dual DPT with 38 drives on 6 busses.  On
> > >>> 3.0-CURRENT SMP.  The system did lose disk drives, either
> > >>> intentionally, or by accident.  I cannot confirm any of Mr. Cobb's
> > >>> finding.  I have not been funished with any data, including the
> > >>> panic point, which I suspect is not in the DPT code.  I am still
> > >>> waiting for such data.
> > >>
> > >> I'd just like to point out that the "biodone: buffer not busy" panic
> > >> doesn't come from the DPT driver, but may be caused by it calling
> > >> biodone() on a buffer that the system does not believe is busy.
> > 
> > Why would a driver call biodone on a buffer that doens't belong to it?
> 
> Probably not relavent, but in the DPT device driver that I wrote for AIX
> I had to put some pretty ugly validity checks in the interrupt code to
> prevent my driver from trying to do an iodone (AIX's version of biodone)
> on already completed (or purged, I don't remember for sure...its been
> over a year now) commands.  Seems that the DPT firmware would (on
> occasion) interrupt with a status packet that pointed to a ccb that my
> driver had already completed.  As I recall this would only happen under
> heavy load and it was pretty intermittant.  As far as I know, it was
> never actually fixed.

Actually, this is *extremely* relevant, if the firmware is still doing 
it and the DPT driver isn't aware of this.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806031828.LAA00592>