From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 00:40:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2EC16A48C; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:40:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524F343D80; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:40:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6M0eLMb001491; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:40:21 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6M0eL88001490; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:40:21 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:40:21 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20050722004021.GB1415@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Robert Watson , current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20050721134816.GA8550@nagual.pp.ru> <20050722011556.T16902@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050722011556.T16902@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:40:39 -0000 On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > coverage, it's not necessarily a locking problem. Out of curiousity, if > you take "options PREEMPTION" out, but leave debug.mpsafenet=1, do things > change? I don't have "options PREEMPTION". Is it good to have? -- http://ache.pp.ru/