From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 28 09:15:50 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570BD106567A
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 May 2008 09:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de)
Received: from smtp-1.dlr.de (smtp-1.dlr.de [195.37.61.185])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9ED38FC23
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 May 2008 09:15:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de)
Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.178.136]) by smtp-1.dlr.de over
	TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Wed, 28 May 2008 11:02:32 +0200
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:02:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>
X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de
To: current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20080528110003.Q24259@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
X-OpenPGP-Key: harti@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 May 2008 09:02:32.0384 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[90555C00:01C8C0A1]
Cc: 
Subject: cp(1) and mmap
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:15:50 -0000


Hi all,

it looks like there is no fallback in cp(1) when mmaping the source file 
fails. I'm mounting SMB shares via smbnetfs (which in turn uses fuse) and 
it seems not to support mmaping files. Shouldn't cp just fallback to a 
normal read()/write() loop in this case?

harti