From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 07:54:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7371716A4CE; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:53:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i22Frwws030306; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:53:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost)i22Frvhr030302; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:53:57 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200403021553.i22Frvhr030302@green.homeunix.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Will Andrews In-Reply-To: Message from Will Andrews <20040302153831.GK13724@sirius.firepipe.net> From: "Brian F. Feldman" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 10:53:57 -0500 Sender: green@green.homeunix.org cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" cc: Michael Nottebrock cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Michael Nottebrock Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/arts Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:54:00 -0000 Will Andrews wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:47:52AM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > P.S. I don't mean to pick on this port in particular. I believe there > > are other ports that install set-user-ID binaries where it is not > > essential. I just haven't had a chance to make a sweep of the tree yet > > to identify them. > > I agree with Michael - I'd rather have working software than > a false sense of security, when it comes to desktop software. > > If you are going to push a "make all setuid bits optional" > agenda, I suggest coming up with a standard means of letting the > administrator specify their policy regarding those. You could > also offer alternate means of achieving the effect that set-id > wrappers/programs intend with their privileges. > > Unfortunately, in arts' case, setpriority(2) is superuser-only. > Perhaps in FreeBSD 5, we should start implementing standard means > of allowing programs like artsd to call setpriority(2) without > privileges, e.g. through MAC. Is it setpriority(2) or rtprio(2)? The latter was implied, and it is NOT acceptable to have ports use rtprio(2) without consent from the system administrator -- and not implicit consent, either. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\