Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 14:37:48 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG (Bill Paul) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Message-ID: <200103102137.f2ALbmC04064@aslan.scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 Mar 2001 13:07:00 PST." <20010310210700.2284F37B718@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >Each link is checked once every second to see if the link is still up. >> >An attempt to send a packet over a dead link will cause the packet to >> >be shifted over to the next link in the bundle. >> >> Any chance this can be done through an async event rather >> than by polling? > >If there was, I would have done it. Perhaps it would be best to create an interface that allows async notification but to provide a default implementation of the interface that polls? This would allow hardware that has a mechanism to detect the state change to override the default method while all other cards "just work" without modification by polling. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103102137.f2ALbmC04064>