Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:59:56 -0400
From:      Keith Stevenson <k.stevenson@louisville.edu>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Inetd and wrapping.
Message-ID:  <19990626105956.A11193@homer.louisville.edu>
In-Reply-To: <48541.930372953@axl.noc.iafrica.com>; from Sheldon Hearn on Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 06:55:53AM %2B0200
References:  <199906252002.NAA31761@sigma.veritas.com> <48541.930372953@axl.noc.iafrica.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 06:55:53AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> 
> I don't think the core team would care enough about something this silly
> to bother making a decision, so I'm just watching what people have to
> say. I'm leaning toward leaving the "nowrap" feature out.

FWIW, I think that leaving out the nowrap feature would be a very good idea.
I'm willing to agree (somewhat grudgingly) that incorporating libwrap is a
definite feature improvement, but this conf file change doesn't seem to buy
much at all.  If a user needs that level of granularity, they can disable
libwrap support on the inetd command line and use tcpd.  

Regards,
--Keith Stevenson--

-- 
Keith Stevenson
System Programmer - Data Center Services - University of Louisville
k.stevenson@louisville.edu
PGP key fingerprint =  4B 29 A8 95 A8 82 EA A2  29 CE 68 DE FC EE B6 A0


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990626105956.A11193>