Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:21:59 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com> To: imp@harmony.village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: dufault@hda.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pccardd, pccardc, the LabPC+, and the NIDAQ 1200 Message-ID: <199902262022.PAA29088@hda.hda.com> In-Reply-To: <199902251003.DAA03943@harmony.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Feb 25, 99 03:03:21 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I don't know why pccardc enabler would work, but I don't understand > that at all... I lied earlier - pccardc and pccardd weren't using the same port. By hand I was using 0x260 while pccardd was trying to use 0x250. The board says it can decode 5 address lines and from this pccardd is deciding it needs 32 consecutive ports without any restriction on the alignment, and in this case handing it port 0x250. I assume this is wrong unless the PCCARD mapping registers are more sophisticated than I expect. I'm about to change pccardd to ensure the returned port address is aligned on a mod bus size boundary - if I'm missing something shout now. I should check gnats on this one to see if I'm encountering a known problem. Peter -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime development, Machine control, HD Associates, Inc. Safety critical systems, Agency approval To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902262022.PAA29088>