Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:54:32 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>, mux@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: cvsup broken on amd64? Message-ID: <CADLo83-QwZUMB6pc2RabaADW9yp_gZUC%2Bqb1TLMe=GY_YhKq2Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110909073305.Horde.oi-EGaQd9PdOaaURAsTRVJk@avocado.salatschuessel.net> References: <20110908221356.Horde.MFEsZ6Qd9PdOaSIEaid2X_A@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <4E692F87.5010708@sentex.net> <20110909073305.Horde.oi-EGaQd9PdOaaURAsTRVJk@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 September 2011 06:33, Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> wrote: > > Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote: > >> Just curious as to why you need cvsup and not instead use csup that is >> in the base ? > > I got used to it in the past 12 years? But this is not realy the question. > If it is "BROKEN" it should be marked as BROKEN or there should be a > statement that it will not work with FreeBSD 9 on at least amd64 or we > will have other users complaining about the same at least when > 9.0 RELEASE is out - right? The cvsup port is normally used now only for cvsupd, for which there is no csupd analog. As far as I know, and perhaps mux (CC'd) could confirm every feature present in cvsup is present in csup-- and it's a fair amount faster too. Of course, cvsup could probably do with fixing, but for now csup is literally a drop-in replacement; it'll read all your supfiles too. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-QwZUMB6pc2RabaADW9yp_gZUC%2Bqb1TLMe=GY_YhKq2Q>