From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 26 01:00:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B706816A4B3 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4E043FAF for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:00:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h9Q90ADK071951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:00:14 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id h9Q90ANN071950; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:00:10 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:00:10 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Dead Line Message-ID: <20031026090009.GA71526@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Dead Line , nico@familiemeijer.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: nico@familiemeijer.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postfix as localhost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:00:26 -0000 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 09:46:36PM +0000, Dead Line wrote: > This is the output of postconf -n [...]=20 > myhostname =3D localhost > mynetworks =3D 192.168.0.0/28, 127.0.0.0/8 Is 192.168.0.0/28 correct? Does it agree with what ifconfig(8) shows the settings on your network interface to be? If you're using RFC 1918 address space on a private network, there's generally no need to subnet as tightly as /28. Most people would use /24 in that situation. In case you can't immediately remember how to convert between all the formats you can express a netmask as: /28 corresponds to a netmask of 0xfffffff0 or 255.255.255.240 /24 corresponds to a netmask of 0xffffff00 or 255.255.255.0 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/m40ZdtESqEQa7a0RAkAHAJ45ThWJfhXk9NIZ6SMAojT3+2Do5gCfYxxy 24W5IAmCTiloc86QRo7lhl8= =aRXL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--