Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:14:18 +0200
From:      Antoine Jacoutot <>
To:, "Crist J. Clark" <>
Subject:   Re: ipfw dynamic rule timeout
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 06:58, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> I think several of the articles point to the easiest solution: Don't
> use keep-state rules in conjunction with natd(8). Keep-state doesn't
> offer you anything more than using natd(8) with stateless rules for
> the vast majority of policies.

Yes, thanks, that's what I though too.
I guess I'll just have to write a new "stateless" ruleset (I always used 


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>