Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:46:34 +0000 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: Brian <bri@brianwhalen.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu>, Steven Kreuzer <stevenkreuzer@yahoo.com>, Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Limitations of Ports System Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0801111846g2e14adcei3e27ea0370262dc4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4761A2DE.4000502@brianwhalen.net> References: <475F7390.9090509@gmail.com> <1022BEDA-8641-4686-AB1A-3FE2D688F47F@FreeBSD.org> <475FAC1F.1010401@gmail.com> <19341C6C-BF3A-4DFD-B8DF-87F4E92B0335@FreeBSD.org> <0F330142-A3CA-4E6E-84BD-FDE55A8E3AEE@yahoo.com> <47619D3D.1070804@math.missouri.edu> <4761A2DE.4000502@brianwhalen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13/12/2007, Brian <bri@brianwhalen.net> wrote: > I just wonder if you asked the general population, whether they'd rather > have ports or packages, I bet most would vote for packages, aside from > those that actually like watching the compilation output fly by. I do like to watch it but in addition I always like to compile my own binaries etc. rather than using something thats precompiled and limited to how the compiler compiled it. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a0801111846g2e14adcei3e27ea0370262dc4>